<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ignore your granny!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://northerndoctor.com/2008/12/28/ignore-your-granny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://northerndoctor.com/2008/12/28/ignore-your-granny/</link>
	<description>&#34;Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition&#34; Adam Smith.                                   A blog from a British doctor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:24:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: northerndoctor</title>
		<link>http://northerndoctor.com/2008/12/28/ignore-your-granny/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>northerndoctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northerndoctor.com/?p=443#comment-402</guid>
		<description>No, you are certainly right. I haven&#039;t been to look but it is almost a certainty that there is much more flu out there than gets reported to the various authorities.

I am guessing that the public health bods assume that the reported cases tend to stay as a fixed proportion of the overall amount of flu. ie they are only the tip of the flu iceberg but a reliably constant tip. It may be a fudge but it is probably a reliable fudge. The alternatives (eg directly asking a large sample of the population) would be too time-consuming to provide useful timely data.

That&#039;s my guess. Happy to be corrected/educated by anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you are certainly right. I haven&#8217;t been to look but it is almost a certainty that there is much more flu out there than gets reported to the various authorities.</p>
<p>I am guessing that the public health bods assume that the reported cases tend to stay as a fixed proportion of the overall amount of flu. ie they are only the tip of the flu iceberg but a reliably constant tip. It may be a fudge but it is probably a reliable fudge. The alternatives (eg directly asking a large sample of the population) would be too time-consuming to provide useful timely data.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my guess. Happy to be corrected/educated by anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soupdragon</title>
		<link>http://northerndoctor.com/2008/12/28/ignore-your-granny/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Soupdragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northerndoctor.com/?p=443#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Just an idle thought from a idle person.... so, we all know not to bother gps with untreatable illnesses (&quot;John Heyworth, president of the College of Emergency Medicine, said most people with flu would not need to see a health professional and would be fine within two or three days&quot;, etc, etc) but the stats seem to be based on people who DO seek help from their gps.
I&#039;m being somewhat flippant but...if non of the people with flu or FLI went to their gps would the stats be at all accurate? Are there other criteria/reports that make up the overall picture?
For example, I&#039;m surprised that the numbers of samples testing positive for flu A were approx.100 in week 50; that doesn&#039;t seem  many to me. Given that several (&gt;10) of the people I know (me inc.) have had flu or flu-like illness in Dec and went nowhere near their gps I&#039;m curious about whether the stats are baseds only on gps reports.
Apologies if this is an ignorant and/or tedious point 

S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an idle thought from a idle person&#8230;. so, we all know not to bother gps with untreatable illnesses (&#8220;John Heyworth, president of the College of Emergency Medicine, said most people with flu would not need to see a health professional and would be fine within two or three days&#8221;, etc, etc) but the stats seem to be based on people who DO seek help from their gps.<br />
I&#8217;m being somewhat flippant but&#8230;if non of the people with flu or FLI went to their gps would the stats be at all accurate? Are there other criteria/reports that make up the overall picture?<br />
For example, I&#8217;m surprised that the numbers of samples testing positive for flu A were approx.100 in week 50; that doesn&#8217;t seem  many to me. Given that several (&gt;10) of the people I know (me inc.) have had flu or flu-like illness in Dec and went nowhere near their gps I&#8217;m curious about whether the stats are baseds only on gps reports.<br />
Apologies if this is an ignorant and/or tedious point </p>
<p>S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexin</title>
		<link>http://northerndoctor.com/2008/12/28/ignore-your-granny/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northerndoctor.com/?p=443#comment-400</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always a shock to see an elderly relation after a break of weeks or months - and this is what I&#039;m telling myself after visiting my mother.  She called me, she had a &#039;bad leg&#039; and wanted extra help, and she seemed to have gone downhill since I last saw her which is before I was ill.

But I can&#039;t fault the NHS doctors and nurses who looked after her during a recent hospital stay, or the carers who go in and cope with her every day (I live 100 miles away thanks to Norman Tebbitt and his &#039;get on your bike&#039; theories of the 80s)  those people have all the gratitude of which I&#039;m capable and then some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always a shock to see an elderly relation after a break of weeks or months &#8211; and this is what I&#8217;m telling myself after visiting my mother.  She called me, she had a &#8216;bad leg&#8217; and wanted extra help, and she seemed to have gone downhill since I last saw her which is before I was ill.</p>
<p>But I can&#8217;t fault the NHS doctors and nurses who looked after her during a recent hospital stay, or the carers who go in and cope with her every day (I live 100 miles away thanks to Norman Tebbitt and his &#8216;get on your bike&#8217; theories of the 80s)  those people have all the gratitude of which I&#8217;m capable and then some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: northerndoctor</title>
		<link>http://northerndoctor.com/2008/12/28/ignore-your-granny/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>northerndoctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northerndoctor.com/?p=443#comment-399</guid>
		<description>I was fine after the flu vaccine but I once had a couple of anthrax vaccines when it looked as though Her Majesty was going to send me to warmer, sandier climes. Dreadful experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was fine after the flu vaccine but I once had a couple of anthrax vaccines when it looked as though Her Majesty was going to send me to warmer, sandier climes. Dreadful experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shrink</title>
		<link>http://northerndoctor.com/2008/12/28/ignore-your-granny/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northerndoctor.com/?p=443#comment-398</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;no hospital beds&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

From a position of unusual smugness, I can say (whilst PCT commissioners can&#039;t hear me) that I&#039;ve got over a dozen beds empty at the moment, so refershingly this isn&#039;t an issue in my corner.

And it makes a world of a difference in feeling so de-stressed through knowing that if hospital in-patient care is needed, it can instantly happen.

I&#039;ve had the &#039;flu vaccine once, when I worked in GP land, and felt so awful after it that I&#039;ve been shy to repeat the process.   Not sure what EBM has to say on cohorts of medics who do/don&#039;t have the &#039;flu vaccine and consequent patient infection rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>no hospital beds</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>From a position of unusual smugness, I can say (whilst PCT commissioners can&#8217;t hear me) that I&#8217;ve got over a dozen beds empty at the moment, so refershingly this isn&#8217;t an issue in my corner.</p>
<p>And it makes a world of a difference in feeling so de-stressed through knowing that if hospital in-patient care is needed, it can instantly happen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had the &#8216;flu vaccine once, when I worked in GP land, and felt so awful after it that I&#8217;ve been shy to repeat the process.   Not sure what EBM has to say on cohorts of medics who do/don&#8217;t have the &#8216;flu vaccine and consequent patient infection rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
